All piece of shit hunters should be shot in the head. I'm all for it. Anyone wants to call me a "wimpy anti hunter" they can see me about that. And before all the asses that want to call me an "internet tough guy" I'll let you know that I do animal rights shit in real life. Not just the internet. Some white trash in a truck next to me had a hunting sticker on their car, but surprise surprise they refused to get out and face someone that would fight back. Hunters are pus*y motherfuckers that should take one right between the eyes.
It has not been going on since the dawn of time. I love how uninformed people crawl back to this all the time. The first man did not eat meat. Homo Erectus, the third stage of man, were the first to eat animals. This just so happened to be the first man that could make fire (a tool needed for humans to eat animals) and other tools like knives (needed, seeing as how humans are not equipped with any natural hunting weapons).
You seem to have an issue that leads you to believe that humans are superior to non human animals. I'd love to hear the reasoning for this.
hno:Uneducated babble at it's finest. The whole population control shit is getting really old, especially since it is complete bullshit. The states with the highest hunting population have the highest deer population. Penn. is the biggest in case you did not know that. When you pay for your hunting license this money goes into breeding programs to keep the population up. Hunting is about money and whitetrash habits, not population control. If we left nature alone we would be better off. We kill off wolves to protect "livestock" and people from supposed attacks (more so the protection of livestock) they are the real predator for deer. So in turn our meat production has led to the "overpopulation" of deer. Are you starting to see how everything is connected? We build more and more which 1. takes away habitat leading to the illusion of overpopulation and 2. gives the deer more food which leads to more fawns being born ie: your idea of overpopulation. You see deer don't eat in wooded areas, they come out in the open to graze. Developments give more feeding areas and thus more food. Naturally deer produce more young when they feel food is plenty.
As for animals that are killed to plant fields of vegetables, many more vegetables are used in meat production. Right around 80% of our corn, oats, wheat, potatoes and numerous other foods are fed to animals, not people. So I would say many more animals are saved in this way as well. This argument is just idiotic.
You are very uneducated about all of this. How on earth did you expect to win an argument?
I find it very hypocritical for those who are anti abortion yet pro hunting and meat eating. Abortion is an economical issue, plain and simple. There is way too much that goes into this issue. By the way, I've spent most of my life very much anti abortion. Me and my girlfriend did not want children yet refused abortion as an option when we found out about here being pregnant. That said I now see the need for this option and how it would be very harmful to the ones in poverty if abortion would be outlawed. The rich would find ways to get their baby girls to legal or safe abortion clinics if need be. Abortion is not a black and white thing, hunting is. Not to mention that abortion will never be made illegal. The ones who want to keep it won't let it go away and the ones against it need it to get elected.
When it comes down to it, in a perfect world, I'm against abortion. But, animals in nature do abandon their young and leave them to die. This is done for various reasons, most of which are health issues. But some are economical in a wild animal way. If a mother feels that there is not enough food to feed them and the young, they will leave the baby to die. It is just crazy to compare abortion to hunting like the other guy did. They are two completely different types of issues with different reasonings behind them.
A life is a life. There is no way possible to make a logical argument that makes one living being less then another living being. Be it a dog, cat, human, fish, cow, elephant or anything else for that matter. As humans we pick and choose what is convenient to our lifestyle to make up our minds. An animal "pet" is the same as an animal for food, the only difference is what is in your mind. Society has told you what to think and seeing as how you don't have a mind of your own, you follow along.
So in other words, you don't have one single counter to any fact or logical argument that I brought up.
How did I say the hunting fees do good? They use some of the money to breed animals so there are enough to kill. That right there does away with any population control issues you have brought up. As for taking away rights, hunters are taking away the right to live. That is the biggest injustice you can have.
